How often do you plan a fun-filled weekend getaway that your entire family goes on? We are heading to The Great Wolf Lodge in Sandusky. My brother, Jerry and his family are already there, as is my sister, Alice and her family. Heading out today will be my older brother, Adam with his family and me with mine.
So, look out Sandusky, Ohio in a short while you shall be Poletown! We are doing this to celebrate Mother's Day and for us Mother's Day is less about gifts and more about spending real quality time with your kids. So, this year, the kids get the gift and we get to enjoy splashing, water slides and resort life!
Not a bad way to honor your mother and be honored as a mother.
Glenn sacks is at it again. This time he takes GREAT UMBRAGE with women that expect the father of their young children to make with some gifts for Mother's Day. In one case, a divorced woman with a 4 year old daughter sent her ex-husband an email from the daughter.
“‘Hi Daddy,’ I typed, as my daughter was fast asleep. ‘Mommy has been talking about Mother’s Day. I only have 143 pennies in my piggy bank. She’s the best mommy ever. She’s been pretty exhausted. I’d like to get her something nice. Can you help? Love you.'“It was a slightly pathetic, but possibly cute, way of reminding my daughter’s father about Mother’s Day."
What does Mr. Sacks think about this: "I love that–mom is so entitled to even more of dad’s money that she brags in the national media about using her four-year-old’s identity to deceive her ex. She feels the need to “remind my daughter’s father about Mother’s Day,” as if it’s his problem."
I get that this dude is all about protecting father's rights. It's a cause that I have always supported. BUT...this is just ridiculous and frankly makes him seem like an obtuse kook! To suggest that this woman DECEIVED her ex-husband is unbelievable. IS he suggesting that the father is so fucking stupid, so dangerously naive that he believed a 4 year old child could have penned such an email. Using good grammar, spelling, caps and punctuation? If so, then that is a father that needs adult supervision and regular instructions on how to inhale and exhale, so he doesn't pass out from lack of air every few minutes. This isn't about being entitled to HIS MONEY, it's about recognition of all a mother does.
I'd bet my last dollar that she wouldn't need a reminder to take her daughter to the store to purchase a trinket for her daddy. Clearly, they are on good terms or she wouldn't have sent the email and he wouldn't have sent her to a spa!
There are many injustices in this world, Mr. Sacks. This isn't one of them. This just makes you look like a bitter and angry woman-hater. A Masculinist? Whatever. Keep fighting the good fight and all that but you keep crying over innocuous bullshit like this and people will start thinking you and even your cause are nothing more than big jokes.
Despite the pronouncements from the media punditry Hillary will not drop out of the race. That's what I like about her. Would this race be Obama's if Florida and Michigan were counted as they should be?
She's losing on a technicality that isn't even her fault. You know this race is crazy when we start wondering what will happen in West Virginia and Montana... Wow, just wow.
Anyway, I'm glad she won't drop out. It's not like she's being blown out. This is a close race and she has every reason to want to wait until the Democratic process [i.e. people voting] is complete. Marc Ambinder has written 7 Reasons for Hillary to Stay in the Race. Being a Michigander, I'm partial to reason number 1:
1. Florida and Michigan. Clinton, not Obama, is identified with the cause of seating those delegations. Since FL and MI won't decide the nomination now, Clinton has every reason to push for a negotiated settlement. It way well be that Clinton refuses to officially drop out until she is satisfied that the voices of Florida and Michigan are heard.
2. Her voters. Almost half of those voting in the Democratic primaries chose Clinton. Certain parts of her support base — older women, for example — are as fervently in her corner as Obama as college kids are in Obama's corner. For these women, Clinton has succeeded in convincing them that her candidacy is just as historic as Obama's. Forget about the nomination: Clinton has a much deeper political base than when she started to campaign for the presidency. She needs to tend to this base whether she continues to represent New York, becomes Senate Majority Leader, becomes the vice presidential nominee, or runs in 2012.
3. Embarrassment. If she drops out tomorrow and winds up winning in West Virginia and Kentucky, Obama will be mightily embarrassed. Having her in the race gives him an excuse for losing those two states. (I ran this by an Obama adviser who said, "We'll take our chances.")
4. The Ask. Does Clinton want to be Obama's vice president? Who knows? But does Clinton want to be asked whether she wants to be his vice president and this be in a position to decline it? Surely. The more Obama is reminded that Clinton cannot not be dispensed with, the more pressure he will feel to at least solicit her views on the subject of the vice presidency.
5. The Party. David Plouffe, Obama's campaign manager, said again this morning that he is confident that the entire party will unify around Obama. If that's the case, then giving Democrats in the remaining states the chance to exercise their vote — and by exercise, I mean it in the conventional sense — to practice voting — will be a boon for Democrats in the fall. 1.5 million Democrats voting in Indiana is spectacular; the primaries are serving as a dry-run of sorts for the entire party. It wouldn't hurt to extend those dress rehearsals to West Virginia and Kentucky either, not to mention Oregon and Montana.
6. Superdelegates. If they're so eager to end the race, they can end the race. They haven't.
7. Unity. If Clinton campaigns appropriately, she can help Obama begin to help heal the party.
Do you know someone with Cancer? Have you yourself survived it? Did you ever lose someone you love to Cancer?
I did. In 2001, I lost my father to Cancer when he was only 64 years old. Because this issue is personal for me and I'll bet personal for many of you, I am walking in the American Cancer Society's Relay for Life. Why am I telling you this? Because I was hoping that someone reading this blog might just be inspired to donate some money to this very worthy cause. My team is very appropriately named Girls with Curves. If you want to help out, please click the link!
I have a few. One of my biggest pet peeves is refusal to take responsibility for your actions.
Nobody likes to accept blame but there comes a time in your life when you have to be an adult and say - I fucked up. Or it's my fault. People that have a chronic inability to say those words will spend days, weeks and yes, even years blaming everyone or everything ELSE but themselves for their woes.
We have no fault insurance but rarely have I ever seen a no fault car wreck. Yes, they call them accidents but someone is responsible for the wreck. Trees don't uproot and jump in front of cars unless a tornado is afoot. If you have a head on collision...someone clearly fucked up.
Sometimes things happen but more often than not someone or many someones made them happen... It's high time people "man up" and accept the blame for their mistakes. And yes, this includes Presidents, Senators and Congresscritters. Everyone.
Stop passing the buck, stop playing helpless victim, just stop already! Pull yourself up by your bootstraps, accept responsibility for yourself and move forward.
Another pet peeve of mine... "Change" left in the toilet. How hard is it to wait 10 seconds to make sure that a 2nd or even 3rd flush isn't needed? If I want to know whether or not you ate corn for dinner, I'll ask. I don't need visual aids.
Clinton is sure to win in Indiana and my guess is that she will win that state by nearly 10 points.
North Carolina has been Obama's to count on for a while. Now we shall see what if any trouble came his way via Rev. Jeremiah "Imus" Wright.
My guess is that Clinton will snatch victory in NC, shocking everyone and then the imploding Obama camp will claim that NC isn't important.
So, what happens if Hillary wins NC? Even if she barely wins it will be the elephant in the room for the Obamatrons. They will no longer be able to ignore the fact that Obama is in trouble and maybe they will start playing nice with Hillary.
I say maybe but likely not. Once you are drinking that much koolaid it's hard to stop.
What happens to Obama if he can't pull out a victory in NC?
Are you shocked? I thought they were all done but NO! Not only that but they have a blog. Guess who will be guest blogging for them on Friday? Our very own Mark Adams will be doing it via American Street.
So keep your eyes open and go give Mark some love...
That reversal of a three-point McCain lead to a six-point deficit for the McCain ticket suggests what might happen (a) when the Democrats unite, and (b) if McCain were to choose a conventional running mate, who, as it were, reinforced the Republican brand for the ticket. As the McCain aide put it, this is what will happen if we run a traditional campaign; our numbers will gradually regress toward the (losing) generic Republican number.
Maybe that’s why, in separate conversations last week, no fewer than four McCain staffers and advisers mentioned as a possible vice-presidential pick the 36-year-old Louisiana governor, Bobby Jindal. They’re tempted by the idea of picking someone so young, with real accomplishments and a strong reformist streak.
It might also be a way to confront the issue of McCain’s age (71), which private polls and focus groups suggest could be a real problem. A Jindal pick would implicitly acknowledge the questions and raise the ante. The message would be: “You want generational change? You can get it with McCain-Jindal — without risking a liberal and inexperienced Obama as commander in chief.” I would add that it was after McCain spent considerable time with Jindal in New Orleans recently, and reportedly found him, as he has before, personally engaging and intellectually impressive, that the campaign’s informal name-dropping of Jindal began.
I'm not saying that choosing Jindal is a bad idea. I'm saying that Bill Kristol is usually wrong, so I won't start pricing McCain-Jindal bumper stickers and t-shirts...
I'm really hoping that McCain pick a good running-mate and not a typical one. I really like the idea of Joe Lieberman. But he's old too...
I'm lookin' for a place to go so I can be all alone
From thoughts and memories
So that when the music plays I don't go back to the days
When love was you and me
CHORUS:Oh, oh moja droga jacie kocham
Means that I love you so
Moja droga jacie kocham
More than you'll ever know
Kocham ciebie calem serce
Love you with all my heart
Return and always be
My melody of love
Wish I had a place to hide all my sorrow, all my pride
I just can't get along
'cause the love once so fine keeps on hurtin' all the time
Where did I go wrong?
CHORUS:Oh, oh moja droga jacie kocham
Means that I love you so
Moja droga jacie kocham
More than you'll ever know
Kocham ciebie calem serce
Love you with all my heart
Return and always be
My melody of love
Oh, oh, {"la-la's" for the first line of chorus}
My melody of love
{"la-la's" for the first line of chorus}
My melody of love
{"la-la's" for the first line of chorus}
FADE
My melody of love
I had no idea that these were tough economic times! It takes 92 bucks to fill my Buick Regal a week. The unemployment rate is almost 10% in Michigan. But if you hadn't come by these "reports" about the "economic indicators" indicating bad times - I'd have NO EFFING CLUE we were headed for trouble. Headed for trouble?
I take back what I said about the $1000/hour hooker Spitzer was seeing. Clearly, she had the economic indicators earlier than the White House and adjusted her rates so she could gas up her SUV.
A woman convicted two weeks ago of running a Washington call-girl ring that catered to the capital’s power elite was found dead here Thursday, and the authorities said she had apparently hanged herself.
The body of the woman, Deborah Jeane Palfrey, 52, was found in a shed at her mother’s home here about 20 miles northwest of Tampa. The police said Ms. Palfrey had left a notebook containing at least two suicide notes and other messages to her family, but they did not give additional details.
When you are servicing powerful Washingtonians, it isn't rocket science to think that getting caught could get you killed. This woman could have easily made millions with a tell-all book and destroyed many careers. So, did she do it? Did she really hang herself or did someone make it look that way?
The vicious Clinton-versus-Obama rupture at Daily Kos, the most activist site in the liberal blogosphere, reflects a party-wide split. What really rankles, as Democrats tear at one another, is the free pass they’ve given McCain—and the White House.
It's true. Last night, on ABC's Boston Legal, we had even more evidence to the split amongst Democrats and the show even touched on why we had a second Bush term. When given choices between people like Howard Dean, John Kerry, John Edwards and Dick Gephardt... You dolts ditch the candidates that could easily appeal to everyone [i.e. John Edwards and Dick Gephardt], then rally behind superlibs Dean and Kerry. When Dean's insanity became news and blog fodder; you went with Kerry.
Clearly, too obtuse to realize that many American voters would find objection with the anti-war antics of the French-looking Senator from Massachucetts who, btw, served in Vietnam before he turned tail and called them all baby killers.
Then what do y'all do? Crazy Howard Dean gets to be the Chairman of the DNC. And you say that WE have no ability to discern. Sheesh!
When the choice is not voting, voting between a French-looking turncoat or the guy already comfy in his big chair; it's not a tough call. You give people no choice. Everyone loses and you have nobody to blame but your own stupid selves.
Now here we are, again. This time it is worse. It's almost religious with the way everyone is split between Hillary and Barry. Here is a little more Wolcott:
Once Edwards dropped out of the race, however, the buffer zone was removed, direct contact replaced triangulation, and the Obama and Hillary supporters faced off like the Jets and the Sharks. The rancor was disproportionate in intensity and extravagant in invective, a fervor worthy of ancestral foes. Months-old grievances seethed and erupted as if they had been bubbling for centuries in a lake of bad blood.
On the most egoistic plane, it seemed like a clash of entitlements, the messianics versus the menopausals. The Obama-ites exuded the confidence of those who feel that they embody the future and are the seed bearers of energies and new modalities too long smothered under the thick haunches of the tired, old, entrenched way of doing things. The Hillarions felt a different imperative knocking at the gate of history, the long-overdue prospect of the first woman taking the presidential oath of office. For them, Hillary’s time had come, she had paid her dues, she had been thoroughly vetted, she had survived hairdos that would have sunk lesser mortals, and she didn’t let a little thing like being loathed by nearly half of the country bum her out and clog her transmission. Not since Nixon had there been such a show of grinding perseverance in the teeth of adversity....
You guys keep it up. Destroy each other, choose wrong again and watch as the Republicans maintain a stronghold on the White House for another 8 years.
Remember what Chris Matthews is fond of saying: “Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line.” The independents will follow the ones that look like adults...guess who that is again?
I'm going to employ the technique called "distancing myself" that politicians like Obama are using.
I'd like to "distance myself" from my former spouse. That means I will not be "asked about him."
I'm going to "distance myself" from all of my debts. I told Chase and the IRS that I strongly wished to "no longer be associated with them" nor "asked about them."
I'm going to "distance myself" from my age. Birthdays are done. I strongly wished to "no longer be associated with them" nor "asked about them."
Laboring to contain damage to his presidential candidacy, Obama said Wright's recent appearances had left him angry and sad. He accused his spiritual mentor of exploiting racism and "giving comfort to those who prey on hate" at a time when the Illinois Democrat is vowing to bring the nation together. And he strongly took issue with some of the pastor's more controversial remarks.
"When he states and then amplifies such ridiculous propositions as the U.S. government somehow being involved in AIDS, when he suggests Minister Farrakhan somehow represents one of the greatest voices of the 20th and 21st centuries, when he equates the United States' wartime efforts with terrorism -- there are no excuses," Obama said. "They offend me. They rightly offend all Americans."
Wright is exploiting racism and I've been saying that from the very beginning. Giving comfort to those that prey on hate... That's as close as you can get to calling someone a traitor and I don't mean traitor to the country. In this case, Rev. Wright is betraying Obama's cause and his trust.
Wright stands by his racially charged remarks. I'm pretty sure Obama is wishing that the Rev. Wright issue would just fade away; but it looks to me that Rev. Wright is angling to be the next Al Sharpton.
The Rev. Dwight Hopkins of the University of Chicago Divinity School said he has known Wright for a number of years. Though Wright was "speaking about his own experiences . . . I also think he spoke as a representative of a lot of black churches in America" who view the criticism of him as a collective attack.
Yes, and that is what has so many people upset. Many people in the black community feel like any attack on Wright is an attack on them. On the flip side, many whites feel that Rev. Wright's statements are an attack on them and that Obama may be playing politician by "distancing" himself but that he agrees with Wright. Hard to know for sure and that lack of trust is translating into trouble for Obama's message of bridging any divides, about hope and change, etc. It will make it more difficult for Obama to wrest away disaffected white working-class voters from Hillary Clinton.
But the Rev. Eugene Rivers, a Boston community activist, was less impressed. Though he called Wright "a good man" who has done lots of good in his 40 years in the ministry, Rivers said his speaking tour "has had the unintended consequence of throwing Senator Obama's campaign under the bus." Obama, Rivers said, has tried to be loyal by not disowning Wright, but Wright's decision to speak out is undermining Obama's message of unity.
Yes, he is making it harder for Obama and he doesn't seem to care. So I ask, is Wright just a guy looking to make himself famous or is he really concerned about bridging the divide between whites and blacks that he himself has helped widen?
My parents did me a disservice. I grew up in a time when children where scolded and sometimes spanked for misbehaving. What this did was teach us respect, cause and effect and personal responsibility. If mom and dad were really concerned about my well being, they would’ve spoiled me … the way many parents spoil their children these days.
I now realize that lack of deserved discipline does not necessarily lead to undesired behavior in children. And that’s made me ponder the huge disadvantage my parents shackled me with, especially after I was spanked for setting the bushes in front of the house on fire at the age of 12. Hence, I’ve developed my “Six Rules of Modern Parenting,” which are designed to not only undue the damage of countless numbers of years of children being spanked by cruel and vicious parents, but to also act as a guide for today’s parents and those considering becoming parents. After all, children truly are the future, so let’s start teaching them and let them lead the way!
Rule #1: Your child is never wrong! This is the most important rule of all to remember, because as a parent, you will no doubt have to defend your little angel to other parents, teachers and police officers who would try to tell you differently. Be sure to vehemently defend your child’s position of superiority in life, preferably in front of the child so that he/she also understands that they can do no wrong. This will surely instill in them the ability to disassociate themselves from the negative effects of their actions and any guilt they might normally feel. Practice this phrase, “My kid would never do that,” and utter it with a proper tone of righteous indignation. You’ll no doubt have to use it frequently.
Rule #2: Your child’s feelings are the most important thing in the world, and this must be stressed to your child. And since their feelings are so important, they must be made aware that other people’s feelings mean diddley-squat. Be sure to teach your children that it doesn’t matter who they hurt, abuse or trample over in their pursuit of happiness. And it’s not enough that you and your child place the utmost importance on your kid’s feelings – it’s imperative that society be expected to do so, as well. Extreme egomania and a selfish, me-based orientation are sure to take your child far in life.
Rule #3: Your children need toys – the more expensive, the better – so buy them for them at every opportunity, not just special occasions. Remember, other kids’ parents are buying their children toys, video games and the most expensive clothes that they can grow out of, and you wouldn’t want your little angel to be the only one on the block to go without. Imagine what that would do to his/her feelings! (Refer to Rule #2.) And besides, the ability to delay gratification is highly overrated – studies have shown that a sense of entitlement is actually paramount to a child’s emotional development.
Rule #4: There is no authority figure higher than your child, so teach him/her to have no respect for adults. How dare a teacher, policeman, co-parent or even friendly Uncle Jerry suggest your child might be misbehaving? (They must not be aware of Rule #1.) Don’t they realize that when it comes to authority, your child(ren) need only answer to themselves. To help in this matter, make sure your child is well versed in all swear words and encourage him/her to use them frequently to adults.
Rule #5: Any kind of structure is bad for your child. Modern wisdom suggests that providing structure for your children – rules, behavioral expectations, bed times, etc. – unfairly forces them to conform to standards of behavior that are not their culture, which is tantamount to parental colonialism. It’s far better to allow your child(ren) to “decide for themselves” how best to spend their days. Should they wish to stay up until 3am eating ice cream sandwiches and watching Saw III, let them! This will help your child develop his/her own set of structure completely separate from the unfair and rigid expectations of their family and society, which no doubt seek to control them.
Rule #6: Do your child’s homework for him/her. This is a very important rule for many reasons, because it reinforces Rules 1-3. First of all, no kid really wants to do his/her homework, and your child is never wrong. Also, the same schoolwork that many of us grew up having to accomplish can cause undue stress and anxiety in your child, negatively affecting his/her emotional well being. Equally important is the time that pesky schoolwork would take away from your child’s enjoying all the video games and toys you’re constantly purchasing. So, like it or not, you better break out the pencil and notebook paper and get cracking; the homework isn’t going to do itself!
So there they are, Mr. Wonderful’s “Six Rules of Parenting,” which represents the latest in pop culture psychology. And remember, these rules are not only easy to follow; they’ve also been created with your child’s best interests at heart. Perhaps they will inspire parents the world over to turn over a new leaf and stop the despicable practice of disciplining their children. Spanking only stops the child from misbehaving for the moment, and worse yet, it could lead to criminal, anti-social, violent, aggressive behavior later in life. Giving your children everything they want, allowing them to do as they please, and not making them accountable for their actions, however, will surely result in happy, well-adjusted children who will become polite, considerate and fair-minded adults.
So, you can use this space to badmouth me, Mr. Wonderful, the blog or whatever you feel like ranting on about. I will be spending the day celebrating my 40th with family, friends and someone very Wonderful.
This was a special day in the history of the universe. For on this day, the Queen of All Evil, Rosemary Kondraciuk was born. Today, we celebrate the 40th Anniversary of this momentous occasion.
Stolat Rosemary.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice Tuesday refuted a statement by former president Jimmy Carter that no one in the U.S. government told him not to go on a trip to the Middle East, where he met with the leadership of the militant group Hamas.
"I just don't want there to be any confusion," Rice told reporters outside an international meeting on Iraq she is attending here. "The United States is not going to deal with Hamas, and we certainly told President Carter that meeting with Hamas was not going to help" the situation in the Middle East.
Carter has said he met with Assistant Secretary of State C. David Welch, who indicated that the trip was not advisable but did not tell him not to go.
Aren't there houses to build? Does he really need to go bopping about the Middle East talking to terrorists and trying to cut peace deals? Didn't he used to have a job that was like that a long time ago? Oh right, he did and he SUCKED AT IT!
Move on, Jimmah! The United States doesn't negotiate with terrorists. That's like a policy or something...
By Matoko Chan over Ben Stein's Intelligent Design movie Expelled Exposed. She totally called the Professor a Theocon shill. He whined but she handed him his ass on this one. (I also added her blog to the blogroll. Very overdue linkage on my part)
I just read an interesting idea on how to fix our public school system over at Over at Adam's Wall.
We need to stop funding schools and start funding children. We are spending about $10,000 per student nationwide. You give that money to the parents in the form of a voucher and the parents are free to put their kids into whatever type of school they believe will do the best job educating them.
All kids learn differently so why are we trying to find a one size fits all version of a school for every child. It makes no sense what so ever.
Now, I know it’s not practical to send every kid from all of the inner city high schools to 1 or 2 really goods schools in the suburbs that may be 30 miles away. Some parents still wouldn’t be able to send their kids to a better school because they don’t have the means to transport them to a school so far away.
We need to stop looking at schools as buildings. Schools should just be a collection of teachers. Think of a school building as something similar to a mall. Where different schools can setup shop in the same building.
You should read the whole thing. Considering the state our school system is in and the fact that more money is never enough, it's nice to see someone come up with a way besides just saying "vouchers" to address the problem.
Odd thing to say when he's been going around equating McCain to Bush. It's almost like he saying that his earlier criticisms about McCain...aren't true. Could it be that Obama has no ability to discern? Or did he just get slip and speak the truth?