My response?

Ty Cobb, where are you when we need YOU?

Just remember, Rosemary, Tony Blair's government is our friend and that is what counts. This writer goes over the line but the Brits and the Aussies are our staunchest allies and I will not let this crass idiot tempt me to think differently even though I know there are lots over there who share his sentiments.

I will remember it Jane. I am just sick and tired of holier than thou, arrogant pricks pulling this kind of shit. We have them here too, but here printing that would have netted jail time for the writer.

Yeah, I'm pissed too... here's some contact info for you.

Actually, in England I am pretty sure if he had avocated the assassination of Tony Blair, he would face charges. The utter lack of respect this writer displays should result in him being put in a persona non grata list, barred entry to the U.S. for life.

WARNING: It is AGAINST THE LAW to assassinate the President of the United States. If you murder the President, you will get the death punishment. And that's irrespective of whether he is a Republican, a Democrat, a Libertarian, a Socialist, or what have you. DON'T DO IT. Vote against him if you don't like him.

John Irving is exactly right (as usual). Had this goof written that here on American soil, he would be expecting a little chat with the President's Secret Service.

Another outrage a while ago was when a writer in the "Village Voice" advocated the extermination of all Republicans. When a major newspaper publishes such rubbish, something is wrong in this country. I will defend your right to free speech, but I will also defend my right to disagree with you. And I most vehemently disagree with this.

Advocating the extermination of the members of any political party, whether Republican, Democratic, Libertarian, Socialist, or even Nazi or Communist, is, morally, completely out of bounds in our political system. We don't deal with our political differences that way.

I also agree completely with the Queen about the effrontry of "The Guardian" in England presuming to tell Americans how to vote. They just won a few (or a lot) more votes for Bush in Ohio. Maybe Karl Rove put them up to it.

Edmond the Libertarian:

Ty Cobb. Excellent!

Back when I was using DOS, I wrote a batch file "ty.batt" which read:

"type | more"

And, a little later, I wrote another batch file "cobb.bat" which read:

"ty cobb.bat"

Thank you, Steven Malcolm Anderson. I may be right quite often, but you are right as often or more, and with much greater eloquence and grace. I often let my Irish side do the typing, and it shows, along with the scorch marks on my keyboard.

Wouldn't it be nice if the her Majesty, the Queen (her Royal Highness, Elizabeth Regina II, Queen of England) dragged this little girly little mongrel to the palace and bitchslapped the shit out of him?

Or Rosemary. I could go with either of those scenarios.

Yes, I think it would be just fine.

The guy sounds like he was drunk. What an idiot.

John Irving

I love the way you express yourself and the scent of the scorch wafts through the net as a perfume to my nostrils. Well, um, I don't know what's got into me tonight. I've got a case of the metaphors, I guess. :)

John Irving:

Thank you! And everything Jane M. said as well.

When hate is your primary tool, and spreading the most hateful and vicious lies is your primary way of trying to beat an incumbent, this is the result.

Thank you, Michael Moore, Daily Kos, and the rest of you far-left assholes who've done so much to encourage this kind of vitriol.

The guy sounds like he was drunk. What an idiot.

Ara,

Not sure which guy you were referring to with the SECOND post.

I swear I didnt have THAT much whiskey! But Mr. Brooker must have been hitting some distilled-compost moonshine before he wrote that diatribe.

Now Michael Moore has caused a guy in England to advocate killing the President! That Moore guy is magical. Omnipotent, really.

Actually, Adam, in Europe Michael Moore is far more influential than he is here. In the UK, where newspapers openly declare their biases, he is one of the darlings of the socialist set. In countries like France, where there is no freedom of the press or right to free speech, he encourages the official government line and is lauded in their media. Only in the US can you actually get to the truth behind his deception, which is why so many people in the United States have such a low impression of this terrorist-supporting blowhard.

You're so right, John. Now we just have to figure out what to do with the millions of people in this country who watched Moore's movie, and who make all his books and DVDs bestsellers. Maybe Michelle Malkin can create some internment (re-education?) camps for them. If all those people have blood on their hands, if all those people are murdering terrorist-supporting human cockroaches, what will we do? What will we do? Talk about a fifth column. Wow.

The Moore-ons consist a sizable minority of the Democrat support, and a bit of Naders, which means they consist of less than a quarter of the US, probably in the very vocal 1-5% range. While its a shame that we have so many shrieking moonbats, its a natural consequence of our freedom, and therefore inherently acceptable. The best solution for disgusting propagandists like Moore is more speech. In the meantime, Moore's support for Kerry is probably responsible for the larger number this year of Democrat defectors to Bush. The more the man from not-quite-Flint rants, the better Bush's chances look.

Adam, have you actually read Malkin's book, or are you just projecting and piling on?

“The Moore-ons consist a sizable minority of the Democrat support…”

Yeah, imagine if Democrats were supported by millions who believed their leader was God’s representative on earth, sent to lead us to the end of days – resolutely.

Bush fanatics have no reason to worry:

1) Bush is going to lose

and

2) Leaders who are assassinated, Lincoln, Gandhi, Kennedy, Kennedy, King, Saddat, Rabin, etc., are almost always great leaders and men of wisdom and peace (which tells you a lot about the politics and the psychology of those who do the assassinating). In any event, George Bush won't be shot; just fired.

Instead Democrats rally behind a man who believes in God, kinda. Who thinks the US is a great nation, sort of (when it is under the guiding hand of the U.N, anyway). Whose one firm conviction, from childhood days, is that he is entitled to be President of the United States, and will say anything, promise any miracle that would make a Fundamentalist Preacher blush, accept any endorsement no matter how reprehensible the source, to get to the Oval Office.

And shep, you might be right about Bush losing. After all, Bush is ahead in all polls, has a firm grip on a greater number of electoral votes than Kerry, but is not willing to resort to the underhanded, power-at-any-cost deceptions and outright fraud the Democrats are engaged in for this election. But I guess having Kerry as President is far more important than having the American system continue to work.

As for assassinations, whose side is endorsing assassinations? Oh, thats right, the Left. With a large sound of crickets from most of the Left (thank you Ara for speaking up!). Whose candidate was a member of an organization who discussed assassinating political opponents, and attended the meetings these tactics were brought up? Oh, wait, that would be the Democratic Party's candidate for President.

If on Novemember 3rd, Kerry is a clear winner, I'll give you my congratulations on being correct, shep. Will you be so gracious when in the far greater probability Bush is re-elected?

Sure, John. As you continue to prove, talk is cheap.

Yes, shep your talk is certainly cheap. Thanks for acknowledging defeat. Have another beer!

4515 http://top-online-poker.info
poker online

1163 http://www.all-texas-holdem.info
texas holdem poker