The Blog Roll

Subscribe

Titles RSS

Get Posts by Email

Powered By Powerblogs
I'll Call It A Draw

Who read the pre-war intelligence estimates? Michael sez:

Is it any wonder this whole thing is a mess? I don’t expect Senators or House members to read every single bill that goes through Congress. But a document that was going to take us to war and cost thousands of American lives?

People like that should be disqualified from running for President. We don’t need another screw-up in the White House.

Only 6 Senators and a handful of Congresscritters actually read the estimate before voting for the Iraq War Resolution. I get what Michael is saying and on principle, he's right. My only objection is that the estimate was wrong. Really, really wrong. So, in the case of Iraq, reading the estimate wouldn't have helped anyone make an informed decision.

Why would Clinton, McCain and the others that didn't read the estimate vote for the authoriztion to use force? We've been hearing about Saddam's weapons programs for YEARS. Years before Bush took office. I had no reason to doubt the claims since they were made by everyone, Republicans and Democrats alike. Neither did Clinton McCain, Dodd and the rest. Reading the estimate would've only confirmed what they already believed, it wouldn't have changed their initial vote. As proof, I'll point to John Edwards. Edwards read the report and voted for authorization.

That said, Michael's point is a valid one. Voting for something as serious as using force without reading all the intelligence available isn't exactly something we want in a leader. We already know what having an uninformed Cinc is like, no? I'd rather have a President that makes decisions after weighing all the available information than one that makes decisions based on word of mouth.

Posted by Rosemary on 05.31.2007
shep (mail):
A good rationale for voting for the smartest guy (or gal) you can find.

Run Al, run.
5.31.2007 11:13am
Ara Rubyan (www):
People like that should be disqualified from running for President.

Screw that...

The people who took us to war should be removed from the office of President.

IJS.
5.31.2007 11:38am
Ara Rubyan (www):
I'm sure someone will complain that I'm 'jacking this thread, but I'm done accepting this crap.

Wake up, people: why are we blaming everyone EXCEPT the very people who made this mess to begin with?

It's like Bush saying: "Y'all were too dumb to stop me so I'm not accountable."

Nice try. I ain't buyin'.

Paraphrasing Rose: "Cooking all the intelligence available isn't exactly something we want in a leader."

You think??
5.31.2007 11:47am
Mark Adams, who's always correct, get used to it. (mail) (www):
I called my CongressCritter, Marcy Kaptur, about the Iraq supplemental. Her aide told me they just got the final language on the bill at 9:00am and the vote was that afternoon -- 400 pages.

No way anyone had a chance to read it all.

No way Bush read it before he signed it into law.

That's how we got that little addendum in the Patriot Act that let Gonzales replace US Attorneys without Congressional oversight. That's how removing habeas corpus got through the military commissions act.

This process is a feature, not a bug of an overreaching executive and all too influential bureacracy.
5.31.2007 10:22pm
Mark Adams, who's always correct, get used to it. (mail) (www):
CORRECTION

Rose, Edwards did NOT read the entire NIE, but was briefed on it.

I don't know if this makes a difference one way or the other, and undoubtedly that's how a lot of this stuff has to work since politicians obviously don't have as much time as us bloggers to read everything out there.

I saw this via Carpetbagger referencing NYTime's Caucus blog:
A spokesman for Mr. Edwards, Mark Kornblau, offered this explanation by e-mail this afternoon: “He simply misunderstood the question. As Senator Edwards has said many times before, he read the declassified version of the N.I.E., as well as other intelligence documents which were ultimately summarized in the classified version of the N.I.E.”

Mr. Edwards and his aides have indeed often said that he did not read the classified version of the estimate before voting for force in Iraq; other presidential candidates, including Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Christopher Dodd, also did not read it before voting to authorize military action, and were only briefed by aides or administration officials on the estimate, their advisers say.

The Politico recently asked several senators if they had read the estimate; among them, Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., another Democratic presidential candidate, said he had read the estimate.
Accuracy is always a good thing.
6.1.2007 9:53pm
Rosemary, Queen of All Evil (mail):
Well then Edwards is on par with McCain. CNN said Edwards "read and was briefed", McCain said he was briefed and read the summary.
6.1.2007 10:10pm
Mark Adams, who's always correct, get used to it. (mail) (www):
Amazingly different post invasion stances between those two, don't ya think?

The NIE, don't forget, was just a summary of all the intel reports they had been reading right along. They both knew the intel better than most humans whether they read every word of the NIE or not.

Knowing what they already knew from all the reports the NIE was based on, I doubt they would have changed their votes. NOW, however, Edwards says he was wrong, and McCain can't admit this was a collosal mistake and would compound this tragedy.

They both made a bad choice in the heat of the moment, as did the vast majority of the entire country. Now, in retrospect with a chance to see the consequences, Edwards has displayed good judgment in reevaluating his position -- McCain shows no judgment at all.

What's more important in a leader, always making the right choices or having the good judgment to acknowledge and correct errors? Except for Ron Paul, every GOPer will continue the war, and every Dem will end it -- period.
6.2.2007 8:49pm
Rosemary, Queen of All Evil (mail):
They both made a bad choice in the heat of the moment, as did the vast majority of the entire country. Now, in retrospect with a chance to see the consequences, Edwards has displayed good judgment in reevaluating his position -- McCain shows no judgment at all.

Well, McCain is at least owning it. He's criticized the Admin on the handling of the war but he knows, from his own personal experience, what could happen if we pull out. I also think that he, like many of us, realize we fucked up but it's our mess and we have the responsibility to clean it up.
6.2.2007 9:40pm
Mark Adams, who's always correct, get used to it. (mail) (www):
I think McCain would fuck a duck on the town square if he thought it would win him a few votes.

But he wouldn't be able to get away with it, because LeBron James would slam dunk the duck.
6.2.2007 11:45pm
Account:
Password:
Remember info?

Help Feed the Children

Tip Jar

Amazon Wish List

QOAE's Amazon Wishes

The images in the advertisements below are dynamically placed and do not necessarily reflect the views of the QoAE.net.

R.I.P. Steven Malcolm Anderson

flag_half_mast.gif

November 27, 2005



QOAE's Favorite article or person

Most Recent Articles

Who Is The

Email Policy

© 2004 Rosemary Esmay & QOAE.net
© 2004 Alice Kondraciuk, web design